Critical Kit Library

👝 📚

Kits are talking, kits are intervening.
A literature review of existing bio and life science kits, related practices and practitioners. Non-comprehensive, non-systematic, non-chronological an alphabetised narrative of things structured from Critical Kits perspectives.


Early reviews led to the Arcade De Bruno a black box arcade cabinet designed by James Medd to play simple Bitsy games inspired by Science and Technology Studies


version tags indicate potential reviewing through making activity

Kit Literature Review

Biomaker Bio Science Spaces & Projects

🔧

📩

Bio-artists & Makers

Artists & Makers particularly committed to biology in their work.

Other Artists

Biopolitics and Geography

🌐

Let’s put non-humans & micro-organisms on maps: they affect landscapes at scale as much as tides and weather. Projects that are part of mobilities to and a way of rethinking microbiology back into the landscape and entangled knittings of the social

Critical Making

Image processing

đŸ“·

Inter Species Gaming

🐛 🐁

Microfluidics

Microfluidic Extruders and Plotters

Microscopes

🔬

Labs, Challenges and Innovation Orgs 🏱

BioMakeSpace Cambridge paper call reading list

Jason S. Leith∗, Albert Kamanzi∗, Dave Sean, Daniel Berard, Andrew Guthrie, Christopher, M.J. McFaul, Gary Slater, Hendrick de Haan∗, Sabrina R. Leslie∗, “Free Energy of a Polymer in Slit-like Confinement from the Odijk Regime to the Bulk“. Macromolecules, 49 (23), pp 9266–9271 (2016).

Gilead Henkin, Daniel Berard, Francis Stable, Marjan Shayegan, Jason S. Leith, Sabrina R. Leslie∗, “Manipulating and visualizing molecular interactions in customized nanoscale spaces“. Analytical Chemistry, 88 (22), 11100–11107 (2016)

Bojing Jia, Tse-Luen Wee, Daniel J. Berard, Adiel Mallik, David Juncker, Claire M. Brown∗, Sabrina R. Leslie∗, “Parallelized Cytoindentation Using Convex Micropatterned Surfaces“. Biotechniques 61, No. 2, 73-82 (2016).

Daniel Berard∗, Marjan Shayegan∗, François Michaud, Gilead Henkin, Shane Scott, Sabrina R. Leslie∗, “Formatting and Ligating Biopolymers using Adjustable Nanotopographies“. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 033702 (2016).

Jalal Ahamed, Sara Mahshid, Daniel Berard, François Michaud, Rob Sladek, Walter Reisner∗, Sabrina R. Leslie∗ “Continuous Confinement Fluidics: Getting Lots of Molecules in Small Spaces“. Macromolecules 49, (7) 2853-2859 (2015).

Sara Mahshid, Mohammed Jalal Ahamed, Daniel Berard, Susan Amin, Robert Sladek, Sabrina R. Leslie*, Walter Reisner*, “Development of a Platform for Single Cell Genomics Using Convex Lens-Induced Confinement“. Lab on a Chip 15, 3013-3020 (2015).

Adriel Arsenault, Jason Leith, Gil Henkin, Christopher McFaul, Matthew Tarling, Richard Talbot, Daniel Berard, François Michaud, Shane Scott, Sabrina Leslie*, “Open-frame System for Single-Molecule Microscopy“. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86(3), p.033701 (2015).

Daniel Berard, François Michaud, Sara Mahshid, Mohammed Jalal Ahamed,Christopher M.J. McFaul, Jason S. Leith, Pierre BĂ©rubĂ©, Rob Sladek, Walter Reisner*, Sabrina R. Leslie*. “Convex Lens-Induced Nanoscale Templating”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 13295–13300 (2014).

Daniel Berard, Christopher M.J. McFaul, Jason S. Leith, Adriel Arsenault, François Michaud, Sabrina R. Leslie*, “Precision Platform for Convex Lens-Induced Confinement Microscopy”. Review of Scientific Instruments, 84, 103704 (2013).

Christopher M.J. McFaul, Jason S. Leith, Bojing Jia, François Michaud, Adriel Arsenault, Andrew Martin, Daniel Berard, Sabrina R. Leslie*, “Single-Molecule Microscopy Using Tunable Nanoscale Confinement”. SPIE Conference Proceeding, 8811 (2013).

Model Organisms

A model organism is a non-human species that is extensively studied to understand particular biological phenomena, with the expectation that discoveries made in the model organism will provide insight into the workings of other organisms.

genetics diabetes diptheria

Non Human networks

🐛

Kit STEM, STS literatures to Review and Condense

The Affective Turn

From Call out for papers The rise of Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Laboratories: Implication for Science, Technology, and Innovation STI Policy via BioMakeSpace Cambridge

DIY lab Practices

Downes, J., Breeze, M., & Griffin, N. (2013) Researching DIY cultures: towards a situated ethical practice for activist-academia. Graduate Journal of Social Science 10(3): 100-124.

Ellis, R. and Waterton, C. (2005) Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: The whereabouts of amateurs, professionals, and nature in knowing biodiversity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23(5): 673-693.

Ferretti, F. (2019) Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 15(1): 1-23.

Fiske A., Del Savio L., Prainsack B., and Buyx A. (2019) Conceptual and Ethical Considerations for Citizen Science in Biomedicine. In: Heyen N., Dickel S. and Bruninghaus A. (eds) Personal Health Science. Offentliche Wissenschaft und gesellschaftlicher Wandel. Springer VS, Wiesbaden.

Halfacree, K. (2004) I could only do wrong: Academic research and DIY culture. Radical Theory/Critical Praxis 68-78.

Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J., and Bonn, A. (2018). Innovation in open science, society and policy-setting the agenda for citizen science. Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy; UCL Press: London, UK.

Gorman, B. (2011) Patent office as biosecurity gatekeeper: Fostering responsible science and building public trust in DIY science. Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law 3(10): 423-449.

Landrain, T., Meyer, M., Perez, A.M. and Sussan, R. (2013) Do-it-yourself biology: Challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement. Systems and Synthetic Biology 7(3): 115-126.

Meyer, M. (2013) Domesticating and democratizing science: A geography of do-it-yourself biology. Journal of Material Culture 18(2): 117-134.

Revill, J. and Jefferson, C. (2013) Tacit knowledge and the biological weapons regime. Science and Public Policy 41(5): 597-610.

Secord, A. (1996) Artisan botany. In: Jardine, N. (eds.) Cultures of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 378-393.

Seyfried, G., Pei, L. and Schmidt, M. (2014) European Do-it-yourself (DIY) Biology: Beyond the hope, hype and horror. Bioessays 36(6): 548-551.

Sleator, R.D. (2016) DiY biology-hacking goes viral. Science Progress 99(3): 278-281.

Tanenbaum, J., Williams, A. Desjardins, A. and Tanenbaum, K. (2013) Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2603-2612), ACM.

Wolinsky, H. (2005) Do-it-yourself diagnosis: Despite apprehension and controversy, direct-to-consumer genetic tests are becoming more popular, EMBO Reports 6(9): 805-807.

Wexler, A. (2016) The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposals. Journal of Medical Ethics 42(4): 211-215.

Alternative DIY Histories Reading List

David, P. A. (2004). Towards a cyberinfrastructure for enhanced scientific collaboration: Providing its ‘soft’ foundations may be the hardest part.

Friesike, S., & Schildhauer, T. (2015). Open science: many good resolutions, very few incentives, yet. In Incentives and Performance (pp. 277-289). Springer International Publishing.

Katz A (2012). Towards a Functional Licence for Open Hardware. International Free and Open Source Software Law Review, 4(1), 41-62.

Pearce, JM (2014) Open-Source Lab: How to Build Your Own Hardware and Reduce Research Costs, Elsevier.

Powell, A. (2012). Democratizing production through open source knowledge: from open software to open hardware. Media, Culture & Society, 34(6), 691-708.

Powell, A. B. (2015). Open culture and innovation: integrating knowledge across boundaries. Media, Culture & Society,
Footnotes

[1] http://www.appropedia.org/Category:Open_source_scientific_hardware

[2] http://www.gaudi.ch/GaudiLabs/?page_id=328

[3] http://blog.safecast.org/

[4] http://publiclab.org/home

[5] http://www.openrov.com/

[6] http://www.instituteofmaking.org.uk/research/lego2nano

[7] https://www.backyardbrains.com/

[8] http://openlabtools.eng.cam.ac.uk/

[9] http://cta.if.ufrgs.br/

[10] http://trendinafrica.org/

[11] http://3dprint.nih.gov

[12] http://www.oshwa.org/definition/

[13] http://www.oshwa.org

[14] http://design.okfn.org/

[15] http://ocsdnet.org/projects/hita-ordo-natural-fiber-honf-foundation/

[16] http://www.citizencyberscience.net/

[17] http://tronic.princeton.edu/pulselab/

[18] http://www.pulsepod.io/

[19] http://itp.nyu.edu/sigs/news/event-science-x-kickstarter-hackathon/